gkopins
07-21-2010, 01:14 PM
Hello,
I am posting this question on behalf of my customer...
In the tests that we did, we found that a minimum time of 20ms was required for transmission/reception. Is there a way to reduce time further down?
We are trying out the program by keeping the board in SLEEP state for a few seconds and then in ON state to check if there is any incoming signal from another node so we can conserve the battery. We need to reduce the ON time to a very short window and still be able to receive at least 5 packets. We are planning to have the Node in SLEEP mode for 1s-2s. And we would like to know if there is a way by which we can have the node ON state in the 500us-1000us and still be able to receive packets without loss.
Is the 20ms time a hardware limitation or is it because of the initialization procedures the function needs to undergo?
Thanks,
Greg
I am posting this question on behalf of my customer...
In the tests that we did, we found that a minimum time of 20ms was required for transmission/reception. Is there a way to reduce time further down?
We are trying out the program by keeping the board in SLEEP state for a few seconds and then in ON state to check if there is any incoming signal from another node so we can conserve the battery. We need to reduce the ON time to a very short window and still be able to receive at least 5 packets. We are planning to have the Node in SLEEP mode for 1s-2s. And we would like to know if there is a way by which we can have the node ON state in the 500us-1000us and still be able to receive packets without loss.
Is the 20ms time a hardware limitation or is it because of the initialization procedures the function needs to undergo?
Thanks,
Greg